is amit shah tadipar ?


The claim that Amit Shah was once “tadipar” (exiled) has been circulating online and in political circles for years. However, the truth behind this claim remains unclear and contested. This article delves into the available evidence, analyzing its validity and presenting different perspectives on the issue.

Origins of the Claim

The allegation of Amit Shah being “tadipar” first surfaced during his early political career in Gujarat. Some sources claim that he was issued a “tadipar notice” by the Ahmedabad Police in the early 1980s in connection with a student protest. This notice would have required him to leave the city for a specific period. However, no official documentation regarding this alleged notice has ever been publicly released.

Supporting Arguments

Proponents of the “tadipar” claim point to various circumstantial evidence, including:

  • Absence of official records: The lack of official documentation supporting the notice is often cited as evidence of a deliberate cover-up.
  • Political motives: Critics of Amit Shah suggest that the notice might have been politically motivated, given his active involvement in student politics and opposition to the then-ruling government.
  • Personal accounts: Some individuals claim to have witnessed Amit Shah being served the “tadipar notice” or being forced to leave the city.


Those who refute the “tadipar” claim argue that:

  • Absence of proof is not proof of absence: The lack of official documentation does not necessarily imply the absence of the notice. It is possible that records were misplaced or destroyed over time.
  • Political agenda: Opponents of Amit Shah and his party are accused of using the “tadipar” claim as a political tool to discredit him and his political career.
  • No legal consequences: If Amit Shah was indeed served a “tadipar notice,” he would have faced legal consequences, such as arrest or imprisonment. However, there is no evidence of any such action being taken against him.


Whether or not Amit Shah was truly “tadipar” remains a matter of debate. Due to the lack of concrete evidence and conflicting perspectives, it is impossible to definitively prove or disprove the claim. Ultimately, it is up to individuals to decide which version of events they find more credible.

Leave a Comment